Lee Harvey Oswald Admired Kennedy--Voice of CIA asset George deMohrenschildt

From audiotape given to me, made by Willem Oltmans, The Netherlands.

I have also stated, for the record, that Lee Harvey Oswald ADMIRED John F. Kennedy.  In my book, Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald, I explain how Lee gave his life trying to save Kennedy's.

Learning more about George deMohrenschildt is a key to understanding Lee Oswald, who, after all, was just 22 years old when George first met him.  Internet media describes DeMohrenschildt's testimony before the Warren Commission as to be more trustworthy than what he finally wrote in his book I'm a Patsy!  But DeMohrenschildt stated clearly in his book and on tape that he regretted betraying his young friend before the warren Commission, was ashamed of himself for doing so, and had determined to set the record straight.

Online media pro-official version sources want us to believe that because deMohrenschildt produced a favorable portrait of Oswald later, we are to forget about that because it differs from the 'original' version.  George still retells some of Lee's flaws and faults -- as he correctly observed, Russian women strike their mates, and Lee had picked up "that Russian habit" which was not appropriate in the USA.  I,myself, saw Lee struggle with --and conquer -- his inclination to hit Marina, who clearly mocked and humiliated him even in the presence of others, as numerous taped statements by DeMohrenschildt and by his wife Jeanne indicate.


HISTORY BEHIND THE TAPES, THE DEMOH BACKYARD PHOTO, AND THE DEATH OF GEORGE DEMOHRENSCHILDT
Dutch journalist Willem Oltmans brought de Mohrenschildt to Holland from Texas in 1977. From Dutch sources I spoke to in 2003, it was generally believed that de Mohrenschildt, who had been placed in a mental institution in Texas after he declared he had been seeing visions and hearing voices, may have been drugged.  His wife, Jeanne,upon being convinced that this might have been the case, agreed to accompany her husband to Holland along with Oltmans.


It turned out that deMohrenschildt had been writing a book about Lee Harvey Osdwald, who, as many Russian did, sometimes called him, therein, Harvey Lee Oswald ('Lee' implied 'oriental' or "Chinese" to the Russian-speaking community at the time,linguistically).  He began reading the contents of his book in a series of taped segments, often interrupted by questions from Oltmans and by comments from Jeanne. There is no evidence of mental disturbance in DeMohrenschildt's tapes.


DeMohrenschildt had sometimes mentioned suicide in the past, but at the time of his so-called suicide later that year, with the promise of his book getting published, having received a $4000 payment for his story in Reader's Digest, he supposedly did just that --under unusual circumstances:


The official version, online:


"On March 29, 1977, while on a break from the interview [with Epstein], de Mohrenschildt received a card from Gaeton Fonzi, an investigator for the House Select Committee on Assassinations. That afternoon, he committed suicide by shooting himself in the mouth with a shotgun."


A HEAP OF BODIES COME BEFORE US AS A RESULT OF THE HSCA'S INVESTIGATION. DEMOHRENSCHILDT'S TIMELY DEATH WAS ACCOUNTED A SUICIDE, UNTIL INVESTIGATED CLOSELY:


First, Epstein's word came into question as to the suicide(from Wikipedia):

"Edward Jay Epstein, an author who interviewed de Mohrenschildt shortly before his death, wrote the following diary entry (29 March 1977)

David Bludworth, The State's Attorney, was a folksy, charming and savvy interrogator. He began by telling me that De Mohrenschildt had put a shotgun in his mouth and killed himself at 3:45 p.m. There were no witnesses — and no one home at the time of the shooting. The precise time of his death was established by a tape-recorder, left running that afternoon to record the soap operas for the absent Mrs. Tilton, and which recorded a single set of footfalls in the room and the blast of the shotgun, which was found on the Persian carpet next to him. No suicide note or other clue was found. He said I was probably the last person to talk to him. Then, he asked whether I had in my possession De Mohrenschildt's black address book. I replied "No." He politely rephrased the question, and asked me again — about a half-dozen times, whether I had the black book.

But Epstein was incorrect — three people were at home at the time: the housekeeper was downstairs in the kitchen, and the cook and gardener were in the backyard."

ONLY after his death did the final "backyard photo" show up---a copy of another backyard photo upon the authenticity of which we must assume due to Jeanne's --not George's--statements:

the "DeMohrenschildt backyard photo" was
revealed only after deMohrenschildt's death...

133-A, found by DPD 133-B, found by DPD 133-C, Dees-White photo 133-A, de Mohrenshchildt photo Mrs. Oswald/Marina photo, destroyed

1. Rifle in left hand, papers in right hand held infront of chest. 2. Rifle in right hand, papers in left hand, both hands at shoulder height. 3. Rifle in left hand, papers in right hand, both hands held up at shoulder height. 4. Similar to 133-A, but with more background showing. (See note 2.) 5. Rifle held over head with both hands.

(source: article by Ian Griggs: "Firearms, Photographs, & Lee Harvey Oswald" from Vol. 1, Issue 1, 1995 Kennedy Assassination Chronicles 


WAS DEMOHRENSCHILDT MURDERED?


Gaeton Fonzi was on his way: instead of finding a talkative George, there was suddenly a dead body. Curiously, ONLY THEN did the DeMoh backyard photo --never previously mentioned by George-- show up.  On the tapes, Jeanne often interrupted her husband, and many of these interruptions contained negative remarks about Lee's comportment, which she sometimes later amended to a more positive note.  It must be remembered that Jeanne had worked as a designer for Abraham Zapruder, who filmed Kennedy's assassination.


She might have been compromised --by fear, or a threat --to produce the photograph and say it had been found in their belongings. She was not living with George at the time of his death. He was visiting a daughter. It was Jeanne who turned over George's manuscript to the HSCA.  We do not know if she edited it.


"if you listen to the tape you hear this...beep-beep-beep-beep-beep---THE SECURITY SYSTEM...shows that someone ...opened the door and... [came] in the house..." --just before George 'killed himself."

Lee Harvey Oswald and His Daughter,June: Insight into Lee's Heart

On Saturday, a day after the assassination, during a ten-minute meetings through panes of glass, using telephones (3:30-3:40 P.M) Robert Oswald, Lee's brother,  reported that Lee Harvey Oswald told him, "Junie needs a new pair of shoes."

Marina with little June soon after JFK died

Ask yourself if a man who worried about new shoes for his little girl --at the time he was charged with the murder of the President of the United States, if this harried, stressed and exhausted subject of national attention could have actually killed Kennedy.

Lee's concern was not only for Junie, his toddler, or for little Audrey Rachel. He also cared for Marina, his wife, though he and I had desperately wished to live together in a marriage of our own.

He cared for  his babies to the end.

To me, Lee said, when I asked him, a short time before midnight (late Nov. 20th) to flee from involvement with the assassination, he replied in a grief-filled voice,"Even if I wanted to, which I do not, I couldn't. We've talked about this before, Juduff. They'd not only do me in, they'd come after my family. They'd find you. You'd all die." A little later, he said, "Tomorrow,I'll go say goodbye to Junie, and Rachel,and Marina--" Lee almost choked when he told me this. We were both crying by then.

Lee cared --more than records show--about his wife during her pregnancy. It's important for you to read the following statement from the anti-Oswald writer,Priscilla McMillan, because in New Orleans, Lee Oswald had matured and was taking more responsibility for his wife and child.  He was sorry when Marina'a advancing pregnancy created problems for her:

"The veins had burst in Marina'a legs and her legs and ankles ached. He rubbed them and kissed them and cried.  He told Marina that he was sorry to put her through such an ordeal and he would never do it again."(p. 675)

We must then consider if Lee Oswald was a perfect, wretched cad when the baby was finally born. Ruth Paine, with whom Marina and Junie were living at the time, implies as much.  YOU decide, after reading what I have to tell you next:

I remember how angry Lee was at Ruth Paine when little Audrey Rachel was born. When Marina went into labor, Ruth persuaded Lee to stay with her little kids and Junie. Ruth argued that Lee's ride to work was with the next-door neighbor and that if he stayed at the hospital with Marina, he wouldn't have a ride to town that he could count on.  Besides, little Junie would have to leave both mother and father at the hospital and return to Paine's house to stay there--the very first time Junie had ever been left without either parent. Junie would be certain to be terribly upset.

Ruth added that since she spoke Russian fluently, she would be able to comfort Marina despite the foreign surroundings. Marina might even feel more comfortable knowing the children weren't in the waiting area making noise. Reluctantly,Lee agreed to the arrangement.

Imagine, then, how Lee felt when Ruth Paine returned quickly--obviously having simply dropped Marina off at the hospital -- saying she saw no reason to stay!
"She took Marina to Parkland--and just left her there!" Lee reported to me. Lee said he was so angry he gave Paine some verbal insults, then went into the bedroom and refused to speak to her again, though he overheard enough from Ruth's call to the hospital to know that Marina gave birth about 45 minutes after she had been admitted to the hospital, and that the birth had been quick and easy.

Ruth Paine herself confirmed in her testimony that she didn't remain with Marina, but she calumniates Lee,making it look like he simply went to bed and didn't even care about what happened to his wife, or to the baby!

Would the man who asked his brother Robert to make sure his little Junie had new shoes really not care about what was happening? Ruth Paine actually got away with it to the Warren Commission, and one of the Commission defenders, David Von Pein (yet another "pain") fell for the lie--for it gave him a chance to further defame Lee Oswald. I have placed in bold face the bold faced lies of Ruth Paine. Wrote Von Pein:

MRS. PAINE -- "I informed him [LHO] in the morning that he had a baby girl. He was already asleep when I got back--no, that is not right. He was not asleep when I got back from the hospital, but he had gone to bed, and I stayed up and waited to call the hospital to hear what word there was.
So, that I knew after he was already asleep that he had a baby girl. I told him in the morning before he went to work. ...."

She later added,  "He went to bed; I stayed up and waited until what I considered a proper time and then called the hospital to hear what news there was...and learned that he had a baby girl. I then went to bed and told him in the morning."

MR. JENNER -- "You did not awaken him then?"

MRS. PAINE -- "I did not awaken him. I thought about it and I decided if he was not interested in being awake I would tell him in the morning."

Von Pein then comments:

[DVP -- The above comments by Ruth strike me as quite humorous (and kind of sad at the same time). Lee Oswald, who knows his wife is going to have a baby any minute, doesn't seem to care about the impending birth of his child in the slightest degree -- he decides to go to bed, while Ruth waits up to find out if Marina gave birth or not and what her condition is. Unbelievable."

===note by JVB: Of course it's unbelievable, because it's a lie. The same man who planed the doors in Ruth Paine's house so they would close properly (see Ruth Paine's testimony,below), who played with Paine's children, who cared about Junie's shoes, and who rubbed his wife's sore feet, DID NOT GO TO SLEEP, NOT CARING WHETHER OR NOT HIS WIFE HAD SAFELY DELIVERED THEIR BABY.

But Von Pein is not a witness--he exists only to besmirch a man who, I assert, with all my strength, has been maligned, lied about, and defamed to the point of absurdity. Lee Harvey Oswald loved his babies!

Ruth Paine

Von Pein has to repeat the horrible lie, to make sure it sinks in, connecting it with the assassination so that the reader will believe that Lee was a monster:
"While her husband Lee went to sleep in Irving, Marina gave birth to Audrey Marina Rachel Oswald at 10:41 PM, Sunday night, October 20, 1963. Rachel's place of birth was, ironically, Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas -- the same hospital where President John F. Kennedy would die 33 days later after having been shot in the back of the head by Rachel's father."
Not so.
Read what another enemy admits...
Near the end of September, 1963, when Lee was set to go to Mexico City --sent on a mission to deliver a dangerous bioweapon , after which mission he had been promised he could STAY there (a point that has been hidden by anti-Oswald writers, who do not wish any link to exist between me and Lee) -- that same country where I was to meet him---we'd divorce quickly and marry there---Lee was heartsick.
Why was he heartsick?   Because when he said goodbye to Marina at that time, with Ruth Paine standing there, waiting to leave for Texas, Lee broke down and wept,believing he might never see little Junie again.

The reason? Lee thought it highly possible that he'd never see little Junie again because he believed he was going to stay out of the country --in Mexico--after his mission in mexico city had been completed. Nor would he see his unborn child.

Here's what the anti-Oswald writer Priscilla McMillan-Johnson had to say about this event, in her book 1977 book, Marina and Lee:

"..when he kissed Marina goodbye, his lips were trembling and it was all he could do to keep from crying." (p.402) "...Lee warned Marina, above all, she was not to tell Ruth he was going to Cuba."(p.463)

Lee had told Marina he was 'going to Cuba' --but only so she would not think about  trying to contact him again. At the same time, he sent letters out to various parties, saying he planned to move to certain American cities, such as Philadelphia.

These letters, we believed, would keep everybody guessing as to Lee's final location, which was going to be in Mexico, likely at Merida, though Lee never mentioned that city as our final destination.  At first, we'd planned to meet on a beach near what is now known as Cancun, then go inland and climb Chichen-Itza. That region of Cancun (which I recalled as the "village of Kankun" from an anthropologist's paper on file in the Tulane library's special "Latin America" collection ) was extremely remote at the time. Later, when the Mexico City assignment fell through drastically, we decided we'd first have to hide in the Cayman Islands for a year or so.

The Real Lee Oswald, in Ruth Paine's Own Words


Ruth Paine did have some decent words to say about Lee, which are buried in Warren Commission records and rarely quoted. On p.509,Vol. II of the 26 volumes,she says this about Lee (who was nevertheless described by the Warren Commission as a murderous loser and lone nut):

Mrs.Paine: ...I saw him as a person who cared for his wife and child, tried to make himself helpful in my home,tried to make himself welcome although he really preferred to stay to himself..."
Paine then mentions W.C. Exhibit No. 425 -- a letter Paine wrote to her mother. Quoting from the letter, Paine stated, "He...was a happy addition to our expanded family. He played with Chris" --my 3 year old, then 2 --"watched football on the TV,planed down the doors that wouldn't close they had shifted and generally added a needed masculine flavor."

When Lee stood his ground on November 22, he found himself unable to save the President he admired, and for whom he had risked his life--and would now give his life.  I also believe that he also saved my life, Marina's life, the lives of Junie and Rachel, and the lives of his double agent contacts in the USSR.  He could not say "I'm CIA--I was a spy, I was sent to Mexico to try to eliminate Castro, after posing as pro-Castro to hide my true identity!"

Instead, knowing what little he could say in his own defense, which would not implicate or endanger others, Lee cried out, "I'm just a patsy!"



SPREAD THE WORD.TELL PEOPLE ABOUT ME & LEE, THE BOOK!
thank you.
JVB

VACCINE SAFETY AND THE SUPREME COURT vs WHAT A VET AND A PHYSICIAN SAYS ABOUT VACCINES FOR PUPPIES

THE US SUPREME COURT HAS RULED IN FAVOR OF DRUG COMPANIES (WHY ARE WE NOT SURPRISED?)...THOUGH A VACCINE CAN CAUSE PROBLEMS, PERHAPS EVEN DEATH, YOU'LL NOT BE ABLE TO SUE THE COMPANY THAT MADE THE DRUG. THIS DECISION WILL NOT HELP MAKE VACCINES SAFER --JUST THE OPPOSITE.

Along with the Supreme Court decision (a 6-2 verdict) came the usual advice: use those vaccines! use them often! don't be afraid of vaccines!  Laws need to be passed to make sure all children get all required vaccines, or they can't attend school! Vaccinate! Vaccinate! Vaccinate!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR. PETER DOBIAS, A VETERINARIAN WITH 20+ YEARS OF EXPERIENCE,  HAS A DIFFERENT OPINION:


"Ultimately, I resorted to nature’s design for immunity; observing and studying the lives of wild canines and other species. Also, I have 20 years of practical experience in veterinary practice and knowledge of immunology. After careful consideration of pros and cons, I have made a decision not to recommend routine vaccination in my practice."
http://www.peterdobias.com/community/2009/03/vaccination-for-dogs-and-cats-a-holistic-point-of-view/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As all of you know, drugs, vaccines and various therapies are tested on animals before they are tested with humans.  The favored lab animals are mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, and primates such as monkeys, marmosets and chimpanzees. Why are dogs, for example, used for testing vaccines?


Answer: dogs are mammals very much like ourselves.  Their immune systems are similar, too.  A puppy has an immune system that is relatively undeveloped, just like the human immune system.

The immune systems in a dog's puppy or in a human's baby work similarly

What the doctors aren't telling you: the immune response to a vaccine may be different for breast-fed babies versus bottle-fed babies, due to antibodies in the mother's milk.

BREASTFEEDING IS RECOMMENDED FOR HUMAN INFANTS.  THE MOTHER'S COLOSTRUM AND MILK PROVIDE IMPORTANT ANTIBODIES FOR HER BABY. IN THE DOG KINGDOM, THE SAME FACTORS APPLY: THE PUPPY GETS ANTIBODIES FROM ITS MOTHER'S MILK. READ WHAT THIS PHYSICIAN,WHO IS ALSO A DOG EXPERT, HAS TO SAY ABOUT PUPPIES GETTING VACCINATED TOO EARLY:

VACCINATION FAILURE  by Dr. Catherine Marley

Puppies are born with some immunity from their mothers. However the main source of early protection from disease is obtained from the first milk, or colostrum. This immunity, derived from the mother, is termed "passive immunity". These antibodies decline steadily in the puppy's blood, beginning shortly after birth. But if the mother had a high antibody level, and passed a large amount of that antibody to her pups, these antibodies may persist for up to 18 weeks.

Now here is the catch! The same antibodies that bind and neutralize a virus, can also bind and neutralize a vaccine. If a vaccine is given while the puppy still has a high level of passive antibodies, the vaccine may be completely neutralized, and therefore will be ineffective in stimulating active immunity. If the shots are poorly timed with respect to the declining level of maternal antibodies, then the pup becomes vulnerable to infection.

The graph below shows two puppies. Puppy A has a high starting level of passive immunity, and Puppy B has a low level. It really dosn't matter, because both pups become susceptible at that time when their passive immunity declines below a protective level, and they have not yet developed active immunity. Puppy A is susceptible at 16 weeks, and Puppy B at 8 weeks.

Vets often prescribe vaccinations for puppies at 6 weeks --even though this will interfere with the puppy's own immune system's structure. Mother's milk gives the puppy all the protection it needs until it's weaned--and sometimes beyond.
With this understanding, a veterinarian's opinion (below) on when and whether puppies should receive vaccines is well worth reading. Then decide for yourself how much stress (and exposure to known/unknown contaminants and dangerous preservatives) you're going to put your infant or toddler through--and how often.

DR. PETER DOBIAS, DVM,  TELLS IT LIKE IT IS:

Unsure about the vaccination safety?

You are not alone!

Questions about vaccines are as common as water in the ocean.

Some people worry that if their unvaccinated dog or cat steps out of the door, it is going to get sick and possibly die.

Let me reassure you that the likelihood of this is very, very low. In fact it is much lower than your dog becoming ill from the vaccine itself.
In this brief article, you will learn about the pros and cons of vaccines and become more comfortable making the right decision for your animal friends.
Over the years , I have heard more confusing opinions about vaccination than about any other medical topic.

Ultimately, I resorted to nature’s design for immunity; observing and studying the lives of wild canines and other species. Also, I have 20 years of practical experience in veterinary practice and knowledge of immunology. After careful consideration of pros and cons, I have made a decision not to recommend routine vaccination in my practice.

There are many reasons for this decision but one of which will become more apparent after watching the video below.

Vaccines contain mercury, formaldehyde and other substances that are proven to be carcinogenic and generally harmful. According to some alternative medicine and homeopathy sources, they also have the ability to induce symptoms that are similar to the disease itself.

The repetition of vaccines is often the source of over reactive or inefficient immune systems, which is at the core of many ailments. There is no doubt that frequently vaccinated patients are ill more often.

Read the following statement from the website of the American Veterinary Medical Association:

“Adverse events may be associated with the antigen, adjuvant, carrier, preservative, or a combination thereof. Possible adverse events include, but are not necessarily limited to, failure to immunize, anaphylaxis, immuno-suppression, autoimmune disorders, transient infections, long-term infected carrier states, and local development of tumors. The role of genetic predisposition to adverse events needs further exploration and definition.”

In my experience, puppies and kittens younger than twelve weeks suffer from the adverse effects of vaccinations more frequently. They have an immature immune system that is incapable of responding to the vaccinations. Their fast growing body is also more sensitive to external factors like vaccines.

The paradox is that puppies and kitten vaccinated early – at 6 – 10 weeks often have no antibodies at 12 weeks. Why? The answer is relatively simple. Vaccine contains antigen. The puppies blood stream contains maternal antibodies. When these two meet, the antibody gets bound to the antigen.

Yes, early vaccination makes your dog less protected! I could show you numerous test results that confirm this claim.

Nature's Vaccination – Socialize your puppy early

Are you surprised by my suggestion? Have you been told not to socialize your puppy until the age of 3 – 4 months? This recommendation is given by some well meaning colleagues. Why? Because that is what we have been taught at schools and told by vaccine manufacturers.

However, it is common knowledge that puppies and kittens are usually protected by maternal antibodies from milk until the age of twelve to sixteen weeks. In the wild, they are naturally exposed to viruses and bacteria by socializing with other individuals and gradually form their own antibodies.

In captivity, I recommend measuring the level of your puppy’s or kitten’s antibodies at the age of 12 weeks. If there are any antibodies present, it is highly likely that your pet is protected and you can socialize it with others on a moderate basis. If it gets in contact with a pathogen, more antibodies – protection – are formed.

School of life

Giving your puppy an opportunity to make friends is very important. There are some dogs who have not been allowed to make friends until the age of 4 months. Imagine. This situation can be compared to a child, who was not allowed to see any other children until the age of 6 years.

Puppies need to learn their doggie etiquette early. Older dogs are generally very tolerant of puppies and they gently guide them or tell them off if their behavior is not “according to the canine standards”.

However most dogs have little patience with rowdy “adolescents” that have no manners, jump in their face and do not respect personal boundaries. They often get beaten up and become scared or aggressive in an anticipation of attack.

Your alternative to vaccination

There is a simple alternative to vaccination called titer test. A titer test determines the level and concentration of antibodies in blood.

I usually recommend performing a titer test at the age of twelve and twenty weeks and subsequently on a yearly basis. By the time your dog is 4 – 5 years old, the chance of contracting distemper or parvo are close to zero and antibody titer may not be needed.

How accurate is antibody testing?


[NOTE BY JVB: PU[PIES CAN GET ANTIBODY TITER TESTS. WHY CAN;'T HUMAN BABIES?]

Some people claim that the antibody levels may not be accurate in determining the level of protection. On the contrary, countries and states like Australia, New Zealand, Hawaii and the United Kingdom use rabies titer testing for animal imports. Let me reassure you that these countries’ rules are so strict, they would not use titer testing if it was not highly reliable.

Rabies vaccination and titer

Even rabies vaccination doesn’t need to be repeated as often as originally thought. Rabies vaccine is manufactured as a 3 year vaccine. After 3 years are up, you can submit a rabies titer test to one of the certified labs and received a confirmation of protection which often persists for liftime.

Some countries and states, for example the UK, Hawaii, Australia and New Zealand are rabies free and have very strict animal import rules. If you are planning to travel to these countries, familiarize yourself with the current guidelines. Rabies vaccine, titer and microchip for identification is usually required.

What if your pet has no antibodies?

On one occasion my dog, Skai, had absent distemper antibodies. I repeated the test a month later and his antibodies were present again. This happened without showing any signs of the disease itself. His immune system simply responded in an efficient way.
In reality, the risk of your pet contracting infectious disease is very low. However, no-one can guarantee 100% safety. Ultimately you have to make your own decision.

What to do if you decide to vaccinate?

1. Stay away from so called “combination” vaccines

[note by JVB: for human babies, "combination vaccines" are given all the time to babies and children ---and should not be!]

2. Give each antigen/ vaccine at least four weeks apart.

[note by JVB: why don't doctors recommend this for human infants, rather than give babies "combination vaccines"?]

3. Vaccinate pets that are twelve weeks and older.

[So why should babies who are being breast-fed get vaccinated at six weeks?]

4. Earlier vaccination often neutralizes the maternal antibodies and may leave your pet unprotected.

[note by JVB: Would this not apply to human infants being breast-fed, as well?]

5. Watch for any side effects that may appear even months later.

[Note by JVB: of course, this is how drug companies can wriggle out of blame--the symptoms develop too late to be linked to the vaccines]

What are common vaccine side effects?

It is often very difficult to determine what is a vaccine side-effect and what is an unrelated incident. One of the ways to confirm is the use of homeopathy. There are several treatments, remedies, that have known abilities to neutralize vaccine side effects. If I use one of these treatments and the disease symptoms disappear, it is safe to conclude that vaccines played a role.

Vaccine side effects often appear similar to the symptoms of disease they were supposed to prevent.

Distemper vaccine may cause skin and ear problems, eye discharges and infections, allergies, or neurological disorders.

Parvovirus vaccine may be the cause of recurrent vomiting and diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease or diet related allergies, heart problems.

Some other commonly seen side effects are:

autoimmune disorders (like lupus)
growth and development abnormalities
epilepsy, anxiety, hyperactivity and aggression
thyroid disorders and diabetes
certain forms of cancer

Which vaccines to give if you decide to vaccinate?

1. Parvovirus vaccine at twelve weeks
2. Distemper four weeks later.
3. Rabies – if you live in an area where rabies is common, or if you travel.

Ideally delay rabies vaccination until six months of age.

Beware of the following vaccines:

Dog owners should be aware of vaccines against Bordetella (kennel cough) and Lyme disease. They often cause severe side effects similar to the symptoms of the actual disease. [note by JVB: bordetella is closely related to b. pertussis --whooping cough--for which children and adults also receive vaccinations.]

If a boarding facility, daycare or a puppy class requests Bordetella vaccine, ask to sign a waiver or if the facility operators are resistant, find another facility.

What to do if you observe a reaction?

Try to stay away from potent steroid drugs like dexamethasone or prednisone. These compounds have very severe and long lasting negative effects on the body and the immune system.

Talk to an open-minded practitioner who will help you find safe and effective treatment. A dose of Thuja 200 C is a good start, however other treatments may be necessary depending on the nature of the reaction.

A detailed evaluation of each patient may be necessary in order to select the correct treatment.

I once read an article that stated “if clean water and nutritious food was provided in Africa, it would be a more effective prevention than any vaccine”. I can’t agree more.
If you want to have a healthy dog, a healthy diet, the right amount of exercise and social interaction, low stress and a loving and caring environment are the best prevention.

[Note by JVB: the same applies to human babies!]

Sincerely,

Dr. Peter Dobias

http://www.peterdobias.com/community/2009/03/vaccination-for-dogs-and-cats-a-holistic-point-of-view/

WHY SHOULD YOU CARE ABOUT VACCINES? READ EDWARD T.HASLAM'S BOOK, DR.MARY'S MONKEY, AND JUDYTH VARY BAKER'S BOOK, ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW,LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD TO UNDERSTAND AND LEARN HOW TO RECOGNIZE THE CORRUPTION AND LACK OF ETHICS THAT CAN EXIST IN THE MEDICAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSION BECAUSE MONETARY GAIN AND PUBLIC CONFIDENCE HAS BECOME MORE IMPORTANT TO BIG PHARMA THAN THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH AND SAFETY.