PAUL WILSON IS AN ARTIST WHOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD DOLL IS CURRENTLY ON TOUR AS PART OF A TRAVELING ART EXHIBITION.
PAUL WILSON IS GAY, AND AN ARTIST. BESIDES THE DOLL CURRENTLY ON TOUR, PAUL HAS CREATED A NUMBER OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD DOLLS ONLINE WHO TOGETHER INHABIT AN ESOTERIC,CHARMING WORLD BASED ON THE 1950'S AND 1960'S. LEE IS PAUL'S HAIRY-CHESTED CHUM AND BOYFRIEND IN THESE HILARIOUS VIDEOS. YOU'LL PROBABLY LAUGH OUT LOUD AT SOME OF THEM.
BUT AS I KNEW THE REAL LEE, I HAVE TO CONFESS I WASN'T SO THRILLED. AFTER ALL,J. EDGAR HOOVER,WHO PROBABLY GOT A WHIFF OR TWO OF MY EXISTENCE, MADE SURE NOBODY WOULD LOOK IN THE DIRECTION OF GIRL FRIENDS--DESPITE LEE'S KNOWN RECORD OF A NUMBER OF CONQUESTS OF THE FEMALE VARIETY AND HIS MARRIAGE AT ONLY 21 WITH A PRETTY GIRL, WHOM HE IMMEDIATELY GOT PREGNANT, FOLLOWED QUICKLY BY A SECOND PREGNANCY.
AS THE BOOK ME & LEE MAKES CLEAR, LEE SOMETIMES POSED AS A HOMOSEXUAL (1) AT LEAST TWICE TO GET CRITICAL INFORMATION ABOUT PRO-CASTRO SPIES, TO (2) SPREAD THE NEWS THAT HE WAS GOING TO LEAFLET AT THE DUMAINE WHARF, AND (3) TO BE MORE EASILY ACCEPTED AMONG DAVE FERRIE'S GAY FRIENDS, SOME OF WHOM WERE, BY THE WAY,BISEXUAL, INCLUDING FERRIE, WHICH SOME PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE (OR ELSE DAVE LIED TO ME).
I WILL NEVER FORGET HOW LEE ASKED ME TO KISS HIM TO "KEEP ME STRAIGHT"-- AS HE PUT IT --A JOKE HE MADE THAT CAUSED US BOTH TO LAUGH, AS HE WAS DOING HIS BEST TO GET ME TO KISS HIM, AND USED THAT AS HIS EXCUSE!
HOOVER SPREAD THE WORD THAT LEE WAS GAY: LEE'S AUTOPSY PHOTOS 'PROVED' HE WAS A HOMOSEXUAL BECAUSE LEE'S PUBIC AREA WAS SHAVED, AS SEEN IN AUTOPSY PHOTOS (ALSO, SEE VOL. XXIV: CE1981 AUTOPSY REPORT).
I AM A LIVING WITNESS WHO CAN ATTEST THAT LEE'S PUBIC AREA CERTAINLY WAS NOT SHAVED--EXCEPT BY THE DALLAS POLICE, WHO WERE SUPPOSED GET 'HAIR SAMPLES'--AND WE KNOW THEY DID BECAUSE THEY OBTAINED 'PUBIC HAIRS' FROM LEE-- BUT THEY ALSO SHAVED EVERY HAIR FROM HIM THERE--IMAGINE HOW HUMILIATING AND DEMEANING THAT WAS! SINCE THEY OBTAINED PUBIC HAIRS, LEE HAD THEM BEFORE THEY WERE SHAVED OFF.
 |
| "WENT TO THE 5TH FLOOR JAIL AND REMOVED HAIR SAMPLES FROM THE HEAD, CHEST, ARMS,ARM PITS,LEGS AND PUBIC AREA OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD. THIS WAS REQUESTED BY FBI AGENT..." |
I,AS ANY BIOLOGIST KNOWS, CAN ATTEST THAT PUBIC HAIRS, WHEN THEY 'FALL OUT' HAVE BULBS ON THE END.
PULL ONE OF YOUR OWN HAIRS OUT AND LOOK At IT. IF YOU DID IT RIGHT, AS A NATURALLY FALLING HAIR WOULD LOOK, IT CARRIES A BULB ON THE END. THAT'S THE PART THAT GREW FROM THE FOLLICLE. WHAT WE SEE IN THE PHOTOS (BELOW) SHOW JUST THE SHAFT. THEY SHOW NO BULB ENDS--ESSENTIAL TO PROVE THE HAIR SAMPLES HAD NOT BEEN TAKEN BY SHAVING THE SUSPECT.
THUS WE FIND IN VOL. XVII: CE672 TWO BADLY UNDEREXPOSED PHOTOS SHOWING A PUBIC HAIR "AS FOUND ON THE BLANKET" THAT SUPPOSEDLY "HELD THE KILLER RIFLE," MATCHED AGAINST PUBIC HAIRS SHAVED FROM LEE BY THE DALLAS POLICE.
THESE COULD BE PHOTOS OF LICORICE STICKS, INSOFAR AS THEIR UTILITY TO THE PUBLIC IS CONCERNED. BUT I HAVE NO DOUBT 'PUBIC HAIRS FROM OSWALD' --WITHOUT BULBS ATTACHED--WERE 'FOUND' ON THE BLANKET THAT 'MATCHED' WHAT THEY TOOK FROM LEE AT THE BEHEST OF THE FBI AGENT.
IN TO KILL A PRESIDENT -- IN THE JAN 24TH ARTICLE, PART V, ARTICLE BY THE EXAMINER, CALLED "WHY WAS KENNEDY ASSASSINATED, AND WHY COVER IT UP?" WRITER DONNA ANDERSON NOTES THAT THE HISTORY CHANNEL SKIRTS THAT TOPIC AND INSTEAD FOCUSES ON PERIPHERAL MATTERS--SUCH AS MALIGNING ME (JUDYTH VARY BAKER) BY SAYING I CLAIM TO HAVE HELPED CREATE AIDS (!!!!). ANDERSON TELLS US THE FOLLOWING:
"...according to Swearingen, the coverup lies squarely with Hoover. At that time, Hoover was the man with all the power. Swearingen believes that the CIA choreographed the assassination and then Hoover stepped in to cover it up. Swearingen even infers that Hoover knew the assassination was being planned and stepped in to help. Hoover was the only person powerful enough to order the Secret Service agents to stand back from the car, to change the parade route and include a left turn, etc.
Remember, the CIA and the Chicago Mafia had explicit photographic evidence of Hoover and his homosexual activities. The CIA also had evidence of Hoover's mixed heritage. At the time, it seemed like the best way out was for Hoover to put the blame directly on Oswald and close the case. And since Roemer, the FBI's man-in-charge, was so willing to jump on Oswald, too, it seemed an open-and-shut case.
But then witnesses started stepping forward. There were 3 shots, there were 6. The Zapruder film clearly showed a shot from the front, brains spewing out over the trunk of the car. Yet, in autopsy photos, there was no sign of an exit wound on the back of the head. Ford even admitted to doctoring the autopsy report.
By this time, though, Hoover was in too deep. He couldn't back down without admitting having knowledge of the mob in Chicago and we all know what the mob was holding over his head.
But how important is it really to know who shot Kennedy? Some experts have said that the coverup of the Kennedy Assassination has forever changed the way we, the public, view our government and our elected officials. That it's not the assassination itself that's important, it's the fact that the government has continued to lie about it for all these years. The end of Camelot was also the end of our faith in those people who claim to be looking out for our best interests. We really haven't been able to believe anything they've said since then because the evidence that they're lying about the JFK assassination is so overwhelming. Just look at any of the headlines in the news and then look for the corresponding conspiracy theories and you'll see the effect the JFK assassination coverup has had on America.
It's one thing to wonder where this country would be had Kennedy not been assassinated. But the more important question is – Where would this country be today if we stopped allowing our leaders to get away with …. well, murder?!" *
WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE IN MIND...WE COME TO PAUL WILSON AND THE MATTER OF HIS CUTE LEE HARVEY OSWALD DOLLS --WHO ARE ENGAGED WITH PAUL WILSON DOLLS IN HILARIOUS FANTASY SCENARIOS, SUCH AS SMOOCHING AT AN OUTDOOR THEATER, BUT SHOULD NOT MISLEAD VIEWERS INTO THINKING LEE WAS GAY.
I ASKED PAUL WHAT HE MIGHT BE ABLE TO SAY TO VIEWERS ABOUT HIS "ARTISTIC LICENSE."AS AN ARTIST MYSELF, I DEFEND THE RIGHTS OF ARTISTS TO SAY WHAT THEY WISH. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT VIEWERS CAN TELL FACT FROM FICTION. HERE'S WHAT PAUL SENT TO ME--AND I THINK IT'S A FRANK AND HONEST RESPONSE:
Ms. Baker, It's Paul Wilson
Continued:
PERSON A: "A gay light? Most of the public knows he was in fact married to one 'Marina Prusakovich,' though few know her last name."
PERSON B: "That is correct. Lee was not a homosexual, and the artist is aware of this. He has read online-forums in which the question was raised as to whether he was even bisexual, which was not the case."
PERSON A: "And so, what is the artist trying to say? Is he out to mislead the public?"
PERSON B: "I do not think so. I think he is so far removed from what the general public may regard Lee Oswald as, that his 'own world' is widely regarded as not factual, especially given the absurd aspects of it. For example, how is it that Paul travels in time to 1950-something, and how then it is also possible that he and Lee - 'Wee' as he is often referred to - have a cocktail party in which Bette Davis or Lucille Ball, both icons of that era, are side-by-side with Anderson Cooper and Cher? It is all fantasy and meant to be good-natured, not salacious."
PERSON A: "Hmm. Some may grasp this, others will think it offensive to JFK and all that had to do with that time period."
PERSON B: "Again, this is what Paul steers clear of, even as far as acknowledging Lee's real life wife in his work. He is not out to slander."
PERSON A: "And what of the occasional 'HANDS OFF CUBA' flyers spotted now and again some of these 'works?'"
PERSON B: "If you take note, those are quickly replaced by 'HELLO KITTY' icons or otherwise discarded by the Paul character."
PERSON A: "And why does the Paul character dress the way he does in these pieces, in a spotted jacket and a pink ladies' hat?"
PERSON B: "From having watched this odyssey from the start, it would seem that is meant to represent a cossack hat, and, yes, a 'gay' one at that. Wilson is not above self-deprecation in his work, even if blatantly so. The jacket is an icon in that the artist actually owns said jacket, so one for his doll had been re-created in miniature so that audiences would indeed realize that the Paul-Doll is indeed Paul, lest they are confused. This is but one of many details the artist has maintained are key to creating his 'world.'"
PERSON A: "Peculiar."
PERSON B: "To many, yes. Even to the artist, at times."
That is the best way I can present it, Ms. Baker. My art is what is is, and as many embrace it for the humor it is meant to represent, and not as fact in any way. I can't deny what I like to do, for that is like denying myself.
Most sincerely,
-Paul (Wilson)
PERSON A: "A gay light? Most of the public knows he was in fact married to one 'Marina Prusakovich,' though few know her last name."
PERSON B: "That is correct. Lee was not a homosexual, and the artist is aware of this. He has read online-forums in which the question was raised as to whether he was even bisexual, which was not the case."
PERSON A: "And so, what is the artist trying to say? Is he out to mislead the public?"
PERSON B: "I do not think so. I think he is so far removed from what the general public may regard Lee Oswald as, that his 'own world' is widely regarded as not factual, especially given the absurd aspects of it. For example, how is it that Paul travels in time to 1950-something, and how then it is also possible that he and Lee - 'Wee' as he is often referred to - have a cocktail party in which Bette Davis or Lucille Ball, both icons of that era, are side-by-side with Anderson Cooper and Cher? It is all fantasy and meant to be good-natured, not salacious."
PERSON A: "Hmm. Some may grasp this, others will think it offensive to JFK and all that had to do with that time period."
PERSON B: "Again, this is what Paul steers clear of, even as far as acknowledging Lee's real life wife in his work. He is not out to slander."
PERSON A: "And what of the occasional 'HANDS OFF CUBA' flyers spotted now and again some of these 'works?'"
PERSON B: "If you take note, those are quickly replaced by 'HELLO KITTY' icons or otherwise discarded by the Paul character."
PERSON A: "And why does the Paul character dress the way he does in these pieces, in a spotted jacket and a pink ladies' hat?"
PERSON B: "From having watched this odyssey from the start, it would seem that is meant to represent a cossack hat, and, yes, a 'gay' one at that. Wilson is not above self-deprecation in his work, even if blatantly so. The jacket is an icon in that the artist actually owns said jacket, so one for his doll had been re-created in miniature so that audiences would indeed realize that the Paul-Doll is indeed Paul, lest they are confused. This is but one of many details the artist has maintained are key to creating his 'world.'"
PERSON A: "Peculiar."
PERSON B: "To many, yes. Even to the artist, at times."
That is the best way I can present it, Ms. Baker. My art is what is is, and as many embrace it for the humor it is meant to represent, and not as fact in any way. I can't deny what I like to do, for that is like denying myself.
Most sincerely,
-Paul (Wilson)
####
About M. Wesley Swearingen:
Swearingen, a 25-year FBI veteran and world renowned whistleblower on FBI corruption and wrongdoing, now rips away the veil of secrecy concealing the FBI’s treasonous misconduct in the 45-year cover-up of JFK’s assassination. He names Cuban exiles; Chicago Mafia; and bad cops trained by the CIA’s twisted murder conspiracy. Swearingen established his credibility in FBI SECRETS, AN AGENT’S EXPOSE?, when he documented FBI fraud and dishonesty. He successfully forced the FBI to admit the truth in cases where the FBI had lied under oath to the courts and to the Congress. Working pro bono he was instrumental in helping plaintiffs win lawsuits against the FBI. Groups such as the BPI of Chicago won in 1981; Fred Hampton and Mark Clark’s survivors won $1.8 million in 1982; the SWP won $246,000.00 in 1986; Geronimo Pratt was released from prison after 25 years and won $4.5 million in 2000. The late Judy Bari won $4.4 million in 2002. The author is in 18 films including US vs. John Lennon.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: To Kill A President, Part V: Why was Kennedy assassinated and why cover it up? - National Coast to Coast Radio | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/coast-to-coast-radio-in-national/to-kill-a-president-part-v-why-was-kennedy-assassinated-and-why-cover-it-up?render=print#ixzz1CemzQeu7
No comments:
Post a Comment